Thursday, March 23, 2023

Play it Again, Stan

 

© Marvel.

I think it's pretty unusual for a comic to publish the same tale, but drawn by different artists. But when it does happen, it does bring into focus how much impact the choice of artist has on the tale. Most recently, Kid over at kidr77.blogspot highlighted a tale of premature burial that appeared both in a Marvel and DC comic, one drawn by Jack Kirby and another by Wayne Howard. Head on over and take a look..it’s worth your time.  In that particular case eighteen years had elapsed between the publishing of the two tales.

In the case of the classic Superman run of “Kryptonite Nevermore”, the story of Kryptonite turning to lead in the early 1970s was returned to twice , each time adding a new perspective. Denny O’Neil wrote the first tale, drawn by Swanderson ; then it was featured in a 1992 Superman Special drawn by Walt Simonson, and finally revisited in the Adventures of Superman in 2001.  So thirty years spanning those tellings. Again, Kid has the details.


But in the case of 1970 Marvel horror anthology title Chamber of Darkness, a mere 6 months had elapsed before the same story received both a new writer and new artist treatment.


Each rendition of the tale was only six pages long:  An airforce pilot crashes , bails out, but eventually realizes that he died and a man who walks through walls turns up to take him into the beyond. 


In the June 1970 edition of Chamber of Darkness #5 (Jack Kirby wrote and drew the tale with inks by John Verpoorten)  a pilot flying a U-2 plane crashes over Red China - eludes capture - and finds his way to a monastery when a mysterious stranger meets him to take him to the hereafter, as they both walk as ghosts through walls.


Six months later in Chamber of Darkness #8, Bill Everett (Script and Inks) and Dan Adkins (pencils) have the pilot flying over Cold War Russia, only to bail out, and find his way to Moscow, only to meet a stranger who meets him, tells him he already died, accompanying him through a wall to the great beyond.


© Marvel. Splash page to the Kirby Story

I much prefer the Kirby rendition - a great splash page, beginning the tale in the aftermath of the crash, an exciting chase scene, and spooky ending. And it merits the Kirby cover. Verpoorten’s inks are very pleasing.


The artwork in the Adkins/Everett rendition is superb, and the inked artwork that sold on Heritage Auctions a while back is stunning, but somehow the lack of tension and horror leaves a rather pedestrian feel to the whole thing.




A comparison of the final panels from the two comics is shown below.


© Marvel.  Jack Kirby's final panels of the tale

© Marvel. Dan Adkins and Bill Everett wrap up the story
There is no editorial comment as to why the story was re-done, but I suspect that Chamber of Darkness #8 needed 6 pages of story to be sandwiched between Ditko and Don Heck reprints and this was an easy way out. At least the heading on the Everett/Adkins story highlights that it is an alternative version.


If you’re thinking of picking up an issue, #5 is the one to go for.  It also features a new tale by Denny O’Neil and Paul Reinman - “The Beast From The Bog!” - which is worth picking up for the title alone!


The cover for issue #8 is a Berni Wrighton rendition.



© Ian Baker

5 comments:

  1. I have both those comics but I never realised they were the same tale. I think that may have been because I bought issue 8 first and picked up issue 5 much later (and probably only scanned it). I really like Adkins art on that tale but I do wonder why they commissioned the same story so soon after the original and why Nil Everett got credited as a writer of the story. I will need to looks these comics out now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think this was one of the very last stories that Kirby drew at Marvel before decamping to DC in 1970, Paul. As my SuperStuff pal Nigel Brown pointed out to me, Kirby worked on Spirit World at DC immediately after this. I wonder if the fact that Kirby both wrote and drew the Chamber of Darkness story may indicate that he was already limbering up for his upcoming work at DC where he was to have full creative control.

      Delete
  2. Apologies for not having visited or commented for a while, but my energy levels have been practically non-existent due to ongoing and unresolved health issues. Should just point out that both versions (the '71 Wayne Howard tale and the '73 Simon & Kirby reprint) on my blog of the Walter Scott story were published by DC, though when the S&K version was first published in the '50s, it was by Prize Comics.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, and thanks for the plug.

      Delete
    2. Thanks for the clarification, Kid, and good to see you back commenting in the blogosphere. Best wishes for your health to improve. No problem on the plug, Kid - my pleasure to do it.

      Delete